Sussman talked. Sussman lied. Sussman walked. Anyone surprised? John Durham did the lawyer thing by releasing an amicable statement acknowledging the jury and showing respect for the legal system. Despite your sudden onset of nausea at hearing his comments, you gave him the benefit of the doubt. Because, to be fair, you don’t know the man. He may be the true-blue bulldog that insiders say he is — ethical to a fault. All you know about the man comes from third party commentators. For many moons, Durham’s been chasing bad actors like Sussman and God knows whom else; and the smart money finally said he had the goods and you should expect indictments and the swift allocation of orange suits. But Sussman walked. He walked — rather arrogantly — like Godfather Michael Corleone after an impotent congressional hearing. It was in the bag. After kneeling over the toilet bowl for 10 minutes, the nausea subsided and your brain found its bearings. Most likely, it’s possible Durham knew the outcome all along. He certainly knew only 4% of Washington D.C. voters chose Trump’s name on the ballot. He knew he could voir dire jurors till the cows come home and never avoid a packed Democrat jury. If that fact is true, you must question why he didn’t ask for a change of venue when a clear, crushing bias existed in the jury pool, as well as in the entire city itself. Possibly he wanted to show the American people how justice could be cheated by corrupted jurors in a nefarious District Court. His ignoring a change of venue leaves you to think out loud, “Hmmmn, maybe he actually wanted the dirtbag to walk to give Hillary and her mercenaries a false sense of confidence.” Maybe Sussman was a test run. Maybe Durham’s guns are loaded for his real target — arguably the most degenerate female politician in U.S. history. Well, Matilda, speculation is one thing; reality is something else. Adding up reality ain’t pretty. Durham has been percolating on the public scene since 2019. Four years. During his investigations, the entire Trump/Russian collusion proved to be a massive hoax (everyday folks on the street knew the fix was in from the get-go). The number of Deep State people engaged in the hoax number in the thousands. Washington itself is mired in wholesale deceit and treason. Four years — one indictment (a deep throat informer). He walked. Take the time to examine crime in America from the beginning, including the infamous Mafia, the Family wars, the protection rackets, murder. Nothing rises near the level of Washington D.C. criminality. Four years — not one conviction. You are not qualified to judge Durham. Or to predict the future of the American system of justice. Your only option is to turn to professionals who rarely make mistakes. Vegas oddsmakers give the indictment of H. Clinton a “Yes” rating of +2000, and a “No” rating of -10,000. Pow!! Vegas also looks at odds for Hillary to make a presidential run in 2024. The “Yes” rating is +300; the “No” number -500. if you believe in the odds, your conclusion must be that Clinton’s popularity as a politician immensely outweighs her depravity as a human being. Therefore, you must also believe that Durham has no chance in hell of nailing the modern-day Medusa. Putting aside this negative stroke, sanity demands that Americans with moral fiber must still harbor some hope, must believe that good prevails over evil. That kind of locker room assertion sounds good. It sounds better if you’re willing to put your money where you mouth is. In either case, Durham doesn’t have to worry. He’s playing with House money.

www.conventionofstates.com