You haven’t set foot in a hospital maternity wing for 13 years. Doubtless, many efficiencies and other improvements have improved the birthing process and postpartum care. And no doubt, new parents and extended families must be learning to form new attitudes and adjust to new codes of behavior in this generous and benevolent environment. For instance, society is finally ridding itself of the archaic, discriminatory practice of greeting expectant families with either “It’s a boy” or “It’s a girl.” Greeting card companies are following suit by eliminating these trite and thoughtless phrases from birth announcements. You’re grateful that the PC Gender & Sexual Preference Council has brought about these policy changes, and also instilled in you a sense of inclusiveness in your relationships. To be fair, no one really has a handle on gender. A newborn may be a they/them; tey/tem; fae/faer; xe/xim; zhe/zhir; jee/jem or a dozen other designations. There’s absolutely no excuse for creating precious lives by assuming them to be male, female, boy or girl. Those decisions can be made later, after they have had the kindergarten opportunity to study gender options. These enlightened attitudes also are essential in new studies on what has been called the “feminization of men.” Easy enough to spot, especially among millennials, males are tapping in to their epicene nature, willing to recognize the value of emotional sensitivities. You heard the feminization before you saw it. You heard it in speech patterns. Uptalk dominates the elocution style of males under 50. Uptalk is the hallmark of Valley Girl “speak” that not only has infected young men but also has swept the world and moved into older generations. Something like a virulent addiction, raising your voice at the end of a sentence softens your opinions and subdues confidence, certainty and resolve. This girly talk, in a sense, sedates masculinity. You saw feminization most recently in men’s apparel, with the introduction of UNTUCKit shirts. Lots of men wear ordinary, untailored shirts loosely. But now young men wear tailored, fitted shirts as a fashion statement, much like women have worn blouses for decades. Psychologically, perhaps subconsciously, young men in particular may have sensed the bull rush of feminization, leading them to carefully contrived “five o’clock shadows,” the manicured facial stubble that shouts, “I’m rugged, forceful, tough.” You shouldn’t ignore the connection among gender equity, the transgender movement, political correctness and the feminization of “men.” You haven’t bothered with studying root causes of social evolution because making a true study would almost certainly interfere with your bias and keeping that bias under 1000 words. Therefore, your prejudicial view is that decades-old Militant Feminism has been the crucible fueling the relentless attack on the traditional, biological view of mankind. Apologies to those offended by the “m” word. With particular attention to transgenders, non binaries and everyone in between, you do recall two scientists who we’re at the forefront of gender studies three quarters of a century ago. The pair introduced gender discoveries not on anyone’s radar. They didn’t win the Nobel Prize — or any peer recognition, for that matter. But their work is highly relevant today.
Bud Abbott: Well, let’s see, we have on the bags, Who’s on first, What’s on second, I Don’t Know is on third…
Lou Costello: That’s what I want to find out.
Abbott: I say Who’s on first, What’s on second, I Don’t Know’s on third.
Costello: Are you the manager?
Abbott: Yes.
Costello: You gonna be the coach too?
Abbott: Yes.
Costello: And you don’t know the fellows’ names?
Abbott: Well I should.
Costello: Well then who’s on first?
Abbott: Yes.
ETC. ETC. ETC.
Well, what can you expect from two insensitive white men.